can anyone make sense of this? The first step says to ask B the counterfactual question, but then the next step says go the god that was identified as not being random from the previous question. However, the first step says “If B answers ‘ja’, then either B is Random (and is answering randomly), or B is not Random and the answer indicates that A is indeed Random.”How do you confirm which one is not random from the first step because it still says that B can either be this god or that god

Why would the counterfactual question elicit a truthful response from the true and false god? false God would still respond falsely since it would protect what it would say by lying about what it would actually say. It would take asking the question that the countefactual question contains, then asking the counterfactual question in a ‘would you say no’, and a ‘would you say yes’ to confirm if it is true or false.

But if you happen to end up asking the random god those questions, random could conveniently randomly choose all the right answers to lead you into believing it is either the true or false god.
Does anyone agree with what I am saying or am I missing something really bad here? I just see a lot of loopholes. But to the creator, still very entertaining.